Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Andrew Kamal v. Femtosense, Inc., et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 24-5417 · judgment December 18, 2024
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate: the model weighted this down for a self-represented petitioner.
Question presented
Whether the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals misapplied the Clark v. Busey transfer requirements under 28 U.S.C. § 1631. Whether the denial of transfer to the Federal Circuit violated the Petitioner’s constitutional due process rights.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Andrew Kamal
For respondent
Brian Robert Matsui
Morrison & Foerster LLP
Case
Subject area
Judicial Power (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Order
Order list, March 10, 2025 · Certiorari denied
Proceedings
- Mar 10 2025Petition DENIED.
- Feb 19 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/7/2025.
- Feb 12 2025Waiver of right of respondent Femtosense, Inc., et al. to respond filed.
- Jan 15 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 12, 2025)