Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Guillermo Gray v. Killick Group, L.L.C.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, No. 23-20295 · judgment August 28, 2024
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
Whether the Fifth Circuit violated 28 U.S.C. ZKHQ LW UXOHG RQ WKH PHULWV RI 3HWLWLRQHU·V )DLU /DERU6WDQGDUGV$FWFODLPZKHQWKHGLVWULFWFRXUWKDG not previously decided the issue.
-
Whether the Fifth Circuit erred when it failed to YLHZWKHIDFWVRI3HWLWLRQHU·V)/6$FODLPLQWKHOLJKWPRVW IDYRUDEOHWRWKHQRQPRYDQW
-
Whether the Fifth Circuit erred by failing to FRQVLGHUDIDFWRUXQGHUWKH)/6$·V(FRQRPLF5HDOLWLHV WHVW ZKLFK UHTXLUHV D FRXUW WR GHWHUPLQH ZKHWKHU 3HWLWLRQHU·VZRUNZDVDQLQWHJUDOSDUWRIWKHHPSOR\HU·V business.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Husein Hadi
The Hadi Law Firm
For respondent
Steven Jon Knight
Chamberlain Hrdlicka White Williams and Martin, PC
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Apr 21 2025Petition DENIED.
- Mar 26 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2025.
- Mar 24 2025Reply of petitioner Guillermo Gray filed. (Distributed)
- Mar 11 2025Brief of respondent Killick Group, L.L.C. in opposition filed.
- Feb 27 2025Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 2, 2025 (30-day extension of time).
- Feb 26 2025Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 3, 2025 to April 2, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
- Jan 29 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 3, 2025)