Kay E. Anderson v. Nebraska

Whether a party can be convicted of a crime based upon evidence obtained under a search warrant that was declared invalid because it was procured by fraudulent misrepresentations and in violation of a state statute? Did the Nebraska Supreme Court properly interpret the holding in Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San Francisco, 387 U.S. 523, 87 S. Ct. 1727, 18 L.Ed.2d 930 (1967) in finding that residents do not have a constitutional right to refuse a request for a warrantless search before an inspection warrant may be issued? PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDING Petitioner Kay E. Anderson (“Anderson”) was the defendant in the original county court action and the appellant before the Nebraska Supreme Court. Kay E. Anderson is an individual. Respondent State of Nebraska (“State”) was the plaintiff in the original county court action and the appellee before the Nebraska Supreme Court. The State of Nebraska is a political subdivision of the United States of America. CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Petitioner is an individual and no corporate entity is a party.