Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

In Re Lorraine Bond

Paid petition


Certiorari denied · March 24, 2025
Pre-decision estimate: 0% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Questions presented

  1. Should the respondents in the above civil action be allowed to Escape justice when part of the respond­ ents namely the City of Philadelphia, PA have been convicted of the bombing the residents of Osage Ave. along with burning down said property, business along with personal property as well as murdering five babies?

  2. Should the petitioner be put out of federal court and told to litigate these issues in state court?

  3. Should the respondents be allowed to steal monies or abuse and / or misuse monies that the federal government gave to the City of Philadelphia, PA to compensate plaintiff and the other residents of Osage Ave.?

  4. Should this amended complaint under Federals of Civil Procedures Rule 15 (b) be allowed to be heard on the merits of truth, and deprives us of our civil liberty and rights, where the respondents violated the 5th and 14th Amendments of the Constitution of the United States of America and these government officials must pay the plaintiff for the damage of property under this law; and where these government employees all took the swear by oath or / pledged to the Constitution duties of this country must be held to the strict standard of law under section (3) of the 14th Amendment. Was the Petitioner and community were never given a fair treatment of the law by these higher appellate courts, or time bar us out in the cold with our rights to these serious facts and is a serious error by the court, and a Conflict of Law.”?

  5. Should this court allow petitioner who is sui juris to be stripped from her rights because of the 3,

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Lorraine Bond

For respondent
Jane Lovitch Istvan
City of Philadelphia Law Department

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Mar 24 2025
    Petition DENIED. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
  2. Feb 26 2025
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/21/2025.
  3. Feb 13 2025
    Waiver of right of respondent City of Philadelphia (incorrectly named by the Petitioner in the litigation as "Philadelphia Mayor Office"; "Philadelphia Police Dep[ar]t[ment]"; "Philadelphia Fire Dep[ar]t[ment]"; "Philadelphia Manager Director Office"; and "Office of the Philadelphia F to respond filed.
  4. Jan 10 2025
    Petition for a writ of mandamus filed. (Response due February 14, 2025)