In Re James Michael Fayed

No-01) IS NOT 18 USC§ 3142 (also known as the Congressional Bail Reform Act of 1984) and -ALL- provisions therein, Binding and Obligatory law upon the lower courts, via United'States Supreme Court (and) U.S. Court of Appeals-9th CCA, within (their) Appellate jurisdiction? No-02) IF a U.S. District Court deliberately - wilfully and KNOWINGLY disobeys & ignores the mandatory provision(s) of. 18 USC§ 3142, provision's requiring and demanding pre-trial release (based upon 'as charged in federal court-) & instead, REVOKES bail previously granted at a bail hearing three days prior, ruling in CLEAR ERROR with prejudicial intent (as shown on the record), IS NOT [that] now 'false imprisonment'? No-03) IS NOT any/all evidence obtained as a Direct-Result (and) deriving from a deliberate, willful & knowingly 'false imprison­ ment' which was done in an entirely unlawful manner & procedure, NOW "tainted" as being subsequent: from.,an unlawful seizure.-of person(s) - violating 4th Amd. (US Const) & 'Fruit of Poisonous Tree Doctrine? No-04) IF petitioner can find NO similar or 'on-point' case or incident in entire Lexis-Nexis database (or) in entire jurisd­ iction of the 9th CCA, -WHERE- a U.S. District Court wilfully, deliberately and knowingly disobeyed and ignored mandatory law of the .higher courts (mandatory law'AS OUTLINED on the record in prior bail hearing) - IS NOT that a case of FIRST IMPRESS­ ION? No-05) IF (a) case presented before this.,Supreme Court of the United States meets the three general requirements of this court -AND- the five general requirements of the U.S. Court of Appeals-9th CCA for ISSUANCE of WRIT relief, should not that.relief be granted? END OF QUESTION(S) PRESENTED