Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Eleazar Diaz-Balleza v. United States
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, No. 24-10597 · judgment March 14, 2025
Question presented
Whether the existence of a pre-removal felony conviction under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) is an element of an enhanced offense that must be proven to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt or admitted during a defendant’s guilty plea. DIRECTLY RELATED PROCEEDINGS United States v. Diaz-Balleza, No. 4:24-cr-49 (N.D. Tex. Jun. 28, 2024) United States v. Diaz-Balleza, No. 24-10597 (5th Cir. Mar. 14, 2025) TABLE OF CONTENTS Question Presented...................................................................................................... ii Directly Related Proceedings ...................................................................................... ii Table of Authorities .................................................................................................... iii Opinions Below ............................................................................................................ 1 Jurisdiction .................................................................................................................. 1 Statutory Provisions Involved ..................................................................................... 2 Constitutional and Statutory Provisions Involved ..................................................... 2 Statement ..................................................................................................................... 4 Reasons for Granting the Petition .............................................................................. 5 I. THE COURT SHOULD OVERRULE ALMENDAREZTORRES................................................................................................................ 5 A. Multiple members of the Court recognize that Almendarez-Torres was wrongly decided. .................................................... 5 B. This Court has undermined the decisions upon which Almendarez-Torres relied for its constitutional holding. ............................. 7 C. At the Founding, recidivism was no different than any other element of an aggravated crime. ......................................................... 8
Counsel of record
For petitioner
James Matthew Wright
Office of the Federal Public Defender
For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General
Case
Subject area
Criminal Procedure (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Order
Order list, October 6, 2025 · Certiorari denied
Proceedings
- Oct 06 2025Petition DENIED.
- Jul 24 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
- Jul 16 2025Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
- Jun 12 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 16, 2025)