Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Nathan Ray Foreman v. Texas

IFP petition · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, No. WR-95,302-01


Certiorari denied · October 6, 2025

Question presented

The investigation and presentation of a motion for new trial after a jury convicts a Defendant is a critical stage of the appellate process. The question herein presented is whether the failure of initial appellate counsel was deficient to require an out of time appeal or hearing on a motion for new trial based on initial appellate counsel’s failure to investigate jury misconduct arising from a juror’s relationship with a co-defendant and his family that would establish the juror’s bias and the granting of a new trial.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Stanley G. Schneider
Schneider & McKinney, P.C.

For respondent

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Oct 06 2025
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Jul 24 2025
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
  3. Jan 07 2025
    Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 10, 2025)