Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Nathan Ray Foreman v. Texas
IFP petition · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, No. WR-95,302-01
Question presented
The investigation and presentation of a motion for new trial after a jury convicts a Defendant is a critical stage of the appellate process. The question herein presented is whether the failure of initial appellate counsel was deficient to require an out of time appeal or hearing on a motion for new trial based on initial appellate counsel’s failure to investigate jury misconduct arising from a juror’s relationship with a co-defendant and his family that would establish the juror’s bias and the granting of a new trial.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Stanley G. Schneider
Schneider & McKinney, P.C.
For respondent
—
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 06 2025Petition DENIED.
- Jul 24 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
- Jan 07 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 10, 2025)