Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Jay J. Lin v. Hudson City Savings Bank, et al.
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, No. 24-2603 · judgment December 12, 2024
Questions presented
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit as a party to this case erred in -failure to review the violation of the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution of the - United States by the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. The District Court of New Jersey denied the supreme power of the Court of Appeals to review the violation to the Constitution by circumventing the Supremacy Clause with the wrong case and wrong laws. The questions presented are:
-
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit should review the case that it was the party to the violation of the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution of the United States by the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey.
-
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit should review the case that it had ordered and completed the briefing of the case re the violation and circumvented the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution of the United States with the wrong case and wrong laws by the District Court.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Jay J. Lin
For respondent
James P. Berg
Parker Ibrahim & Berg LLP
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 06 2025Petition DENIED.
- Jul 10 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
- Jul 02 2025Waiver of right of respondent Hudson City Savings Bank, et al. to respond filed.
- Apr 02 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 7, 2025)