Sheterria Lanelle Jackson v. Florida

! i i I. DID THE TRIAL COURT ERR WHEN IT DENIED PETITIONER’S CLAIM THAT ! I > COUNSEL WAS INEFFECTIVE FOR FAILING TO CHALLENGE EVIDENCE ■ ; ; PRESENTED AND FOR FAILING TO FILE A MOTION TO SUPPRESS, IN TURN 5 ; ! VIOLATING HER SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF : ; ; COUNSEL AND HER FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS OF ! LAW? : i i II. WAS THE PETITIONER’S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO EFFECTIVE : ! ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL UNDER THE SIXT AMENDMENT AND DUE PROCESS ; : RIGHT UNDER THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT VIOLATED WHEN TEH TRIAL COURT DENIED PETITIONER’S CLAIM THAT COUNSEL WAS INEFFECTIVE ; ; FOR FAILING TO ISSUE FOR A PRE-TRIAL MOTION TO DISMISS? ! ! i : !- : ! : ! ! i I ; i 1 i ! t : ; ! i i ; i ! ! 11 : i : i;