Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Alejandro R. Duarte v. Nebraska
IFP petition · Court of Appeals of Nebraska, No. A-24-083 · judgment January 14, 2025
Question presented
I. In a he-said-she*said case involving allegations of physical assault with self-defense being raised as an affirmative defense, is defense counsel ineffective for failing to offer easily attainable medical evidence to support defendant’s claim that he was physically incapable of doing what he was accused of due to a recent injury and surgery? II. Can an appellate court deem an issue on appeal waived by relying on just the issues disclosed in a preliminary disclosure statement of issues for appeal rather than reviewing the issues that were actually argued by the intermediary appellate court and argued in brief format to that same intermediary appellate court?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Alejandro R. Duarte
For respondent
Cody Steven Barnett
Nebraska Department of Justice
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 06 2025Petition DENIED.
- Jun 26 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
- Jun 17 2025Waiver of right of respondent Nebraska to respond filed.
- May 07 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 20, 2025)