Tamika Seay v. Georgia, et al.

What do the litigant and accused do when the state court and the appellant court says two different things?

Whether procedures the United States Government followed satisfy Due Process of Law under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment before it deprived Petitioner of life, liberty and property without due process of law, accused her of crime, deprived her of the right of notice, trial by jury, an attorney, the right to be free from self-incrimination and unlawful seizure?

Whether the United States Government violated Petitioner’s Substantive Rights and fail to conform to the “ Due Process Clause” under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment, Bill of Rights and Substantive Due Process to prevent the government’s interference and unwarranted intrusion with fundamental rights including custody of her child and the right to trial by jury.

Whether error in this case meets the criteria of a “ Plain Error” under FRCP Rule 52(b): the mistake must be clear, obvious, and affect the substantial rights of the Petitioner.

Did the state court effectively carry the decision of the Appellant Court(s) into effect?

Whether the United States Government had or has probable cause for the seizure of the Petitioners child?