Timmy Orlando Collier v. Michigan

DID THE DISTRICT COURT COMMIT A RADICAL JURISDICTIONAL DEFECT BY NOT FOLLOWING MICHIGAN'S LAW AND STANDARDS SET FORTH BY MCL's, MCR's, AND FOURTH, FIFTH AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION? DID THE COURT OF APPEALS BECOME AN ADVOCATE FOR THE PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE WHEN THE PROSECUTOR FAILED TO FILE A RESPONSE TO THE ORDER GIVEN BY THE COURT OF APPEALS, THUS VIOLATING APPELLANT'S RIGHTS TO DUE PROCESS UNDER THE CONSTITUTION AND EQUAL PROTECTION OF LAW. DID MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND PROSECUTOR VIOLATE APPELLANT’S FOURTH AMENDMENT CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT AND EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAW BY SECURING AN ARREST WARRANT WITH "BARE-30NE" COMPLAINT?