Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

In Re Jona B

Paid petition


Certiorari denied · March 10, 2025
Pre-decision estimate: 0% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Question presented

PI Preface This petition is filed by me, a pro se mom, for my 14-year-old who did no crime, yet was unlawfully cited in a truancy case & referred to CYS by the school & for all conspiracies, targeted hate crimes, safety violations and progress hindrances the school district & gov org were carrying out against me & my kids for the past 10 years. The unlawfully filed cases against me & my child are part of these targeted hate crime conspiracies. I had to exercise my “fimdamental parental rights” (Routten v. Routten, 843 S.E.2d 154, 159 (2020), Washington v. Glucksberg, 521 U.S. 702 (1997), the court declared that the Constitution. & specifically the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment. protects the fundamental right of parents to direct the care. upbringing, and education of their children.) & my daughter’s “immunity rights” to keep her safe home because the school was unlawfully tampering with her school records, causing hindrance to her academic progress & endangering my child’s health, life & safety. Nothing unlawful was done by my kid or me. Even the “Compulsory Attendance Law” is not violated by BTRRWus - for she still learnt, completed 5 college courses, way more advanced than her school courses. As per Pa. Act 1949 & Pa. Edu Title 22 Ch 4 fmade for federal ESSA accountability) the school has to count these as Weighted Credits to her GPA the school agreed to do so but didn’t do. Questions Presented What made the school, School District, School Board, magistrate Court, CYS, Cops misuse their power to cite & file cases unlawfully & unconstitutionally against me & my kid in the magistrate district court & refer my kid to CYS take unconstitutional action of sending CYS again & again to our place & then make them file in a” JUVENILE CASE” instead of taking right action on the things I mentioned in the emails I sent them? While the main reason I could not send my daughter to school was because this school violated my daughter’s safety, tampered with her school records to harm

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences

Proceedings

  1. May 27 2025
    Rehearing DENIED.
  2. May 06 2025
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/22/2025.
  3. Apr 04 2025
  4. Mar 10 2025
    Petition DENIED.
  5. Feb 19 2025
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/7/2025.
  6. Jan 25 2025
    Motion to expedite consideration of the petition for a writ of mandamus filed by petitioner.
  7. Dec 30 2024
    Petition for a writ of mandamus filed. (Response due February 7, 2025)