Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Kevin Michael Cardwell v. Paul David Bojrab, M.D., et al.

IFP petition · Court of Appeals of Indiana, No. 23A-CT-2577 · judgment August 26, 2024


Certiorari denied · October 6, 2025

Questions presented

1,] Should individuals convicted of sex offenses be considered a protected class under U.S.C 1985 (3), given that their constitutional rights are often violated,as exemplified by this case where two doctors allegedly conspired to administer a fatal overdose to the petitioner solely because of his status as a child molester, with the act being averted only due to the lead doctor’s personal connection to someone incarcerated for a similar offense? 2.] Should an attorney be appointed in cases involving serious allegations where the petitioner, suffering from cognitive impairments, is unable to seek redress due to the court’s denial to expose the conspiracy due to petitioner's crime. 3.] Are people who work for the social security officer are considered liable under 42 U.S.C 1983 0 '

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Kevin Michael Cardwell

For respondent
James Allen Barta
Office of the Indiana Attorney General

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Oct 06 2025
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Jun 18 2025
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
  3. Jun 04 2025
    Brief of respondent Paul David Bojrab, M.D. in opposition filed.
  4. May 14 2025
    Waiver of right of respondent Carol Sheridan, M.D. to respond filed.
  5. May 08 2025
    Waiver of right of respondent Theodore E. Rokita to respond filed.
  6. Apr 15 2025
    Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 4, 2025)