Kenneth Carey, et al. v. Jonathan Kirk, et al.

FEDERAL QUESTIONS 14(1)(a) Plaintiffs seeks de novo review of the entirety of the District Court Case No. 21- 20408-CIV-MARTINEZ-BECERRA and the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals No. 23-10308 which set a precedent in this case that creates extraordinary danger to individual and community safety and security for the pure unnecessary desire for corporate and individual profits. Plaintiffs seeks these specific questions for review:

1. Are UMG and Interscope Records able to handsomely profit from their involvement and contributions to an illegal marketing scheme comprised from illegal physical attacks by Jonathan Kirk aka DaBaby that created viral media coverage and increased DaBaby’s social media following by the millions?

2. Should the District Court have dismissed UMG and Interscope Records Motion to Dismiss Count for conspiracy when 1. Plaintiff’s provided video admissions by involved but now deceased coconspirator Cam Coldheart, 2. proof that Defendants hid and suppressed required contract language that would include UMG in the contract between Plaintiffs and DaBaby/Jonathan Kirk and expose their involvement in the agreement, 3. UMG blatantly ignoring their code of conduct requiring actions taken to 4. avoid hurting other people over 16 times in nearly monthly periods and many more facts that support the Plaintiff’s cause of action for conspiracy.

3. Can a company trade name (Interscope Records) evade service and any lawsuit because it is designated as a division of a larger company, even though it is one of the most recognizable brands in the world, contracts under the brand name Interscope Records and holds itself out to the public as a company?

4. Is UMG and Interscope Records subject to the long arm jurisdiction based on their involvement and profit from the contractual agreement in Miami, Florida area and owning a company that has an office in Florida and selling