Sam Autry Fletcher v. Eric Guerrero, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division

1 1. Does Title 28 U.S.C. §2254(e)(l) or any other provision of the AEDBA, or any clearly established U.S. Supreme Court authority give frderal district or circuit courts discretion to disregard or ignore a state habeas petitioner's clear and convincing evidence which substantiates and proves true all of the petitioner's claims;and,1,therefore?, rebuts the §2254(e)(1) statutory presumption of correctness? 2. What form of recourse or type of redress is available to petitioner's that submit irrefutable digital audio, photographic,and other documented ary evidence that supports and proves the verity of all of theenetitiona petitioner's factual assertions and validity of Constitutional claims set forth in the Petitioner's 28 U.S.C. §2254 habeas petition, and \ the petitioner's proffered evidence is repetedly disregarded, ignored ^ and overlooked by all state and federal courts that reviewed or passed upon petitioner's claims? r -i-