James Todino v. X Corp., fka Twitter, Inc., et al.

Whether Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act provides continued immunity to internet platforms that knowingly host user­ generated content involving impersonation, harassment, child exploitation, and death threats after repeated notifications, law enforcement referrals, and ignored court orders—especially where such conduct implicates federal criminal statutes and exposes the legal void in regulating online harm.

Whether the Massachusetts Appeals Court erred in upholding dismissal without considering claims that platforms supported criminal activity, and whether the Supreme Judicial Court violated due process by denying further appellate review, thereby barring civil remedies based on an overbroad interpretation of Section 230, contrary to Congressional intent to permit recovery for criminal harms. * i