Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
David Efron v. Madeleine Candelario, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, No. 23-10691 · judgment August 2, 2024
Before the decision, roughly the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a circuit split argued in the petition, an Eleventh Circuit decision below, and counsel who has filed here before.
Questions presented
The questions presented are:
-
Does the Rooker-Feldman doctrine bar a civil-rights suit alleging judicial corruption that led to a state-court judgment when the plaintiff does not seek to relitigate, review, modify or set aside any issue decided by the statecourt judgment?
-
Does the Rooker-Feldman doctrine preclude federal jurisdiction over a civil-rights claim for damages arising from extrinsic fraud committed by private parties in collusion with corrupt state-court judges, when the injury stems from the conspiracy itself rather than the later state-court judgment?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
John Granville Crabtree
Crabtree & Auslander
For respondent
Gustavo Daniel Lage
Sanchez-Medina, Gonzalez, Quesada, Lage, et al.
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Apr 28 2025Petition DENIED.
- Apr 09 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/25/2025.
- Mar 31 2025Waiver of right of respondent Madeleine Candelario and Michelle Pirallo Di Cristina to respond filed.
- Feb 26 2025Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including March 31, 2025.
- Feb 20 2025Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 28, 2025 to March 31, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
- Jan 28 2025Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 29, 2025 to February 28, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
- Jan 28 2025Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 28, 2025.
- Dec 26 2024Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 29, 2025)