Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Carlin U. Powell v. Jay Forshey, Warden
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, No. 24-3460 · judgment November 18, 2024
Question presented
I. GROUND ONE: It is unconstitutional to allow state witnesses to commit perjury, as well as the State prosecutors to commit subornation of perjury, and the tampering of evidence. GROUND TWO: Trial counsel provides ineffective assistance of counsel when it withheld evidence and did not call fourth an expert witness on matters concerning scientific evidence. GROUND THREE: Insufficient “DNA” evidence, fraudulent analysis of “Serologist Joseph Serowik,” State of Ohio’s two laboratories testing’s were compromised, with two contradictive results on same “DNA” evidence analyzed. GROUND FOUR: State of Ohio is in violation of “Treaty” pursuant the “Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act,” (IADA). Article III. (a), and IV. (c). O.R.C.2963.30. Article 1, 10, U.S. Constitution. Violation of VI, and IVX Amendments of U.S. Constitution. LIST OF PARTIES “Cuyahoga County Prosecutors Office Officers: “Edward Fadel,” “Mary Frey,” and “Nichole DiSanto.”
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Carlin U. Powell
For respondent
Thomas Elliot Gaiser
Office of the Ohio Attorney General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences
Proceedings
- Jan 12 2026Rehearing DENIED.
- Dec 03 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/9/2026.
- Apr 04 2025Petition for Rehearing filed.
- Mar 10 2025Petition DENIED.
- Feb 20 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/7/2025.
- Feb 11 2025Waiver of right of respondent Warden Forshey to respond filed.
- Jan 24 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 3, 2025)