Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Todd DeGeer

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, No. 23-2625 · judgment September 3, 2024


Certiorari denied · March 24, 2025
Pre-decision estimate: 6% cert probability (95% interval 3%–10%)

Before the decision, modestly above the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a circuit split argued in the petition, an Eighth Circuit decision below, and a petition filed soon after the judgment below.

Question presented

In American Pipe & Construction Co. v. Utah, 414 U.S. 538, 554 (1974), this Court held that “the commencement of a class action suspends the applicable statute of limitations as to all asserted members of the class who would have been parties had the suit been permitted to continue as a class action.” This case involves a certified class action where the class was narrowed and then decertified. The Eighth Circuit held, consistent with the Fifth and Ninth Circuits, but in conflict with the Fourth and Tenth Circuits, that in this situation American Pipe tolling should be extended beyond “members of the class” to include persons who were not “members of the class” so long as they were not “unambiguously exclude[d]” from the class. App. 2a. The question presented is: Is American Pipe tolling limited to actual members of the putative or certified class, or does it extend to non-class members so long as they were not “unambiguously excluded” from the class?

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Thomas Henderson Dupree Jr.
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP

For respondent
Matthew W.H. Wessler
Gupta Wessler LLP

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Mar 24 2025
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Feb 26 2025
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/21/2025.
  3. Feb 26 2025
    Reply of petitioner Union Pacific Railroad Company filed. (Distributed)
  4. Feb 12 2025
    Brief of respondent Todd DeGeer in opposition filed.
  5. Jan 30 2025
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including February 12, 2025.
  6. Jan 27 2025
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 3, 2025 to February 12, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
  7. Dec 18 2024
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 3, 2025. See Rule 30.1.
  8. Dec 17 2024
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 3, 2025 to February 2, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
  9. Dec 02 2024
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 3, 2025)