Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Peter J. Strauss v. United States District Court for the District of South Carolina
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, No. 23-2312 · judgment April 26, 2024
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Must a district court judge recuse himself in a criminal case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§144 and 455 when provided a timely and sufficient expert affidavit required by 28 U.S.C. §144 and after the judge had become an adverse witness to the said criminal defendant attorney by wrongfully reporting him to the state’s ethics commission for invoking his Fifth Amendment rights in violation of U.S. Supreme Court precedent in a prior civil proceeding, both circumstances of which would lead an objective observer to reasonably question the judge’s impartiality?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Joseph Parkwood Griffith Jr.
Joe Griffith Law Firm, LLC
For respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar
Solicitor General
Proceedings
- Jan 13 2025Petition DENIED.
- Dec 18 2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2025.
- Dec 09 2024Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
- Nov 25 2024Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 27, 2024)
- Sep 20 2024Application (24A280) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until November 29, 2024.
- Sep 17 2024Application (24A280) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 30, 2024 to November 29, 2024, submitted to The Chief Justice.