Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
J. Michael White, et al. v. Lindsay Davis, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, No. 22-12913 · judgment June 20, 2024
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
This Court has held that a private actor making it’s own choices under authority granted to it by the state, and acting on those choices, is not a state actor. The town of Lake View granted White authority to collect sewer charges and fees from customers and White chose to act in accordance with his authority. Did the court of appeals err when it held that White was state actor? This Court has held that a punitive damages award should bear some reasonable relationship to the corresponding award of compensatory damages. The jury awarded punitive damages of $2,443,000 on certain of the plaintiffs’ claims, and awarded compensatory damages of only $9 on those same claims. Did the court of appeals err when it found the 271,444 to 1 ratio of punitive to compensatory damages to be a reasonable relationship?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Bill D. Bensinger
Christian & Small LLP
For respondent
G. Scotch Ritchey Jr.
Cockrell, Cockrell, Ritchey & Ritchey, LLP
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Feb 24 2025Petition DENIED.
- Jan 22 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2025.
- Jan 02 2025Brief of respondents Lindsay Davis, et al. in opposition filed.
- Dec 03 2024Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 4, 2024 to January 4, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
- Dec 03 2024Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 6, 2025. See Rule 30.1.
- Oct 31 2024Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 4, 2024)