Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Arthur Lopez v. Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Three, et al.
Paid petition · Supreme Court of California, No. S282744 · judgment January 8, 2024
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
1.) Should Due Process of Law as mandated by the United States Constitution Fourteenth Amendment be afforded to self-represented litigant Plaintiff related to Civil Case against Defendant on the Matters of Infliction of Emotional Distress and Plaintiffs claims against Defendants to the United States Bankruptcy Court and Leave to Amend Complaint? 2.) Should self-represented litigant Plaintiffs Right to Appeal / review Civil Cases and Tolling Doctrines and Exceptions to res judicatas be afforded? 3.) Should Conflict of Interest discovered by Petitioner in regards to Presiding Justice Kathleen O’Leary, CA Court of Appeals 4th
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Arthur Lopez
For respondent
—
Proceedings
- Jan 13 2025Petition DENIED.
- Dec 04 2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2025.
- Jun 06 2024Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 21, 2024)
- Jan 24 2024Application (23A682) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until June 6, 2024.
- Jan 10 2024Application (23A682) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 7, 2024 to June 6, 2024, submitted to Justice Kagan.