Gatewood A. Walden v. The Disciplinary Board of the Alabama State Bar

Whether, in Petitioner’s appeal, the Alabama Supreme Court justices violated his rights under the equal protection clause of the Eighth Amendment to the U. S. Constitution by failing to follow the appellate court’s binding precedent which had previously reversed a lower court’s ruling that found the Disciplinary Hearing Officer did not comply with Ride 4.2 (b) (6), Ala. Rides Dis. P. in his Report and Order. II. Whether, by affirming a lower court’s decision, the Alabama Supreme Court justices violated Petitioner’s rights under the Eighth Amendment to the U. S. Constitution since a state regulatory agency’s decision revoking his business license was unlawful or void for the reason that the Disciplinary Hearing Officer faded to comply with the requirements of Rule 4.2 (b)(6), Ala. Rules Dis. P. and Alabama Supreme Court precedent in Cooner v. Ala. State Bar Assoc.. (2013) 109044, 1111340, 59 So. 3d 37) by omitting to make specific findings of fact and conclusions of law? III.