Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Scott Meide v. Pulse Evolution Corporation, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, No. 22-13404 · judgment December 13, 2023
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate: the model weighted this down for a self-represented petitioner.
Question presented
I Has F.R.Civ. P. I been abrogated by judicial fiat? II Should the Rules Concerning Unpublished Opinions Be Rewritfen and/or Modified? Do We Have a Government Of Laws And Not Of Men (or Women)? IV May A Corporation Assign Its Interest In A Lawsuit to a Non-Lawyer? V Did the District Court Subject Petitioner To A Piecemeal Appeal? VI Should Plaintiff Have Been Granted Discovery? VII Were The Sanctions Imposed Unreasonable? VIII Was Petitioner Entitled To An Unbiased Judge? :
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Scott Meide
For respondent
Michael D. Lee
The Liles Firm, P.A.
Case
Subject area
Judicial Power (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Order
Order list, October 7, 2024 · Certiorari denied
Proceedings
- Oct 07 2024Petition DENIED.
- Aug 28 2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
- Aug 08 2024Waiver of right of respondents John King, Agnes King, Greg Centineo and Julie Natale to respond filed.
- Mar 07 2024Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 15, 2024)