Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Ashok Kumar Cheejati, et al. v. Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, No. 23-40398 · judgment July 5, 2024
Before the decision, about 1.7× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a Fifth Circuit decision below, a circuit split argued in the petition, and counsel who has filed here before.
Questions presented
-
Whether there is clear and convincing evidence that Congress intended 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(ii) to preclude judicial review of unlawful withholding claims?
-
Whether a statutory deadline is required to state a claim under 5 U.S.C. § 706(1) under the Administrative Procedure Act?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Bradley Bruce Banias
Banias Law, LLC
For respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar
Solicitor General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Jan 21 2025Petition DENIED.
- Dec 31 2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/17/2025.
- Dec 12 2024Brief of respondents Blinken, Sec. of State, et al. in opposition filed.
- Oct 25 2024Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 12, 2024.
- Oct 23 2024Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 12, 2024 to December 12, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
- Oct 01 2024Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 12, 2024)