Carlos A. Alonso Cano, et al. v. 245 C & C, LLC, et al.

• Whether the CA, erred and violated the Canon 3B (6) of the Code of Conduct of U.S. Judges for not ordering the DC, to investigate the fraud upon the court, that we denounced was committed by Defendants’ attorney Leslie W. Langbein, together with Defendants’ Court Reporter Mr. Elias Martinez, by redacting the transcripts of our depositions and by withholding until today, the Zoon recordings of those depositions that are needed to be compared with the “forged” transcripts that they provided and filed in the DC and in the CA.

• Whether the CA, erred by “conclusory” saying that we filed frivolous motions without demonstrating it, based on what says the 11th Cir. R. 27-4.

• Whether the CA erred by granting Defendants’ motion for sanctions against us, even when the Defendants neither contradict nor defeat each one of our arguments and evidences, demonstrating that the Defendants and their lawyer, mislead the DC, misrepresented the facts, withheld relevant evidence and committed discovery abuses all of which have affected the outcome of this case.

— Whether the CA erred by imposing us to pay Lawyer’s fees to Defendants, using the two cases of Procup v. Strickland, 792 F.2d 1069, 1073-74 (11th Cir. 1986) and Theriault v. Silber, 579 F.2d 302, 303 (5th Cir. 1978), to support its order (Doc. 81 5/31/24), when these two cases were not decided in the context of the Fair Housing Act.