Scott York v. United States, et al.

A. DO THE NINTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS PANELS’ (EN BANC) RULING, THE NINTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS’ ORIGINAL RULING, AND THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA’S RULINGS CONFLICT WITH A DECISIONS) OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT THEREBY CREATING NECESSARY REVIEW BY THE SUPREME COURT TO SECURE AND MAINTAIN UNIFORMITY OF THE COURT'S PRECEDENT? B. DOES THE COURTS ACTIVE INVOLVEMENT IN FRAUDULENTLY CONCEALING THE ILLEGAL AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL USE OF BRAIN-COMPUTER INTERFACE (“BCI”) DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS (“DEW”) BY GOVERNMENT DEFENDANTS, IN PROCEEDINGS BROUGHT BY UNITED STATES CITIZEN AND CIVILIAN PLAINTIFFAPPELLANT-PETITIONER, RESULTING IN ONGOING CONTROL AND ATTACKS ON PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT-PETITIONER, ‘SHOCK THE CONSCIENCE?’ C. IS IT AN ABUSE OF THE COURT’S SUA SPONTE AUTHORITY PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, RULE 12(b)(6) AND RULE 15(a) FOR A JUDGE VIA ISSUANCE OF A