Joseph Marion Rywelski v. Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President of the United States, et al.

Whether this case will resolve all current and future disputes with respect to governmental regulation of Petitioner’s, and all other bona fide U.S. Citizens’, Right to Keep and Bear Arms at the municipal, state, federal, and international level.

Whether all parties to Petitioner’s Petition, the lower courts, and this Court, have already unanimously agreed to uphold the laws and , authorities Petitioner has cited in proceedings below and what Petitioner is requesting pursuant to those authorities.

Whether the District and Federal Circuit, in their opinions, and cited opinions, are diametricallyopposed-to, and in direct conflict with the federal law of the Enabling Act of (among others) New Mexico Territory and Arizona Territory 36 U.S.Stat. 557, 568— 579 pursuant to Equal Footing Doctrine, Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution; and diametricallyopposed-to, and in direct conflict with the U.S. Code according to 1 U.S.C. 204(a), pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 285b.