Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Michael J. Libman, et al. v. Antwon Jones, et al.
Paid petition · Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, No. B313095 · judgment December 15, 2023
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
This Court has used a proportionality test in analyzing whether a state imposed fine is excessive under the Eighth Amendment but has not yet had the opportunity to apply the test to court-ordered disgorgement of attorney fees for violation of a state’s rules of professional conduct. The question presented is: Does the court-ordered disgorgement of attorney fees for violation of state rules of professional conduct fall under the “excessive fines” clause of the Eighth Amendment where there has been only benefit to the clients and no assessment of the attorney’s ability to pay?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
David Zarmi
Zarmi Law
For respondent
—
Proceedings
- Oct 07 2024Petition DENIED.
- Aug 28 2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
- Jul 08 2024Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 12, 2024)
- May 22 2024Application (23A1044) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until July 8, 2024.
- May 17 2024Application (23A1044) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 28, 2024 to July 8, 2024, submitted to Justice Kagan.