Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Hugh H. Baldwin, Jr. v. Maryland
Paid petition · Supreme Court of Maryland, No. 371, September Term, 2023 · judgment April 19, 2024
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
Did the State commit a Bad Faith Due Process Violation resulting in outstanding legal consequences to the petitioner, to wit: Significant Collateral Consequences not previously recognized by the Court?
-
Did the State's failure to provide discovery result in outstanding legal consequences to the petitioner, to wit: Significant Collateral Consequences not previously recognized by the Court?
-
Was legal counsel to petitioner, Public Defender, Mr. Robert V. Jones and Appellate Counsel, Public Defenders, Mr. John JL. Kopolow, and Mr. Alan H. Murrell ineffective?
-
Did the inability to obtain transcripts of all court hearings, deprive petitioner of the earliest opportunity to pursue post-conviction relief, (while incarcerated, on parole, or on probation) thereby resulting in outstanding legal consequences to the petitioner, to wit: Significant Collateral Consequences, not previously recognized by the Court?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Hugh H. Baldwin Jr.
For respondent
Jeremy Hugh Welter
Maryland Office of the Attorney General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 07 2024Petition DENIED.
- Jul 24 2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
- Jul 17 2024Waiver of right of respondent Maryland to respond filed.
- Jul 08 2024Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 9, 2024)