David John Thistle v. Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President of the United States, et al.

Article II of the Constitution of the United States requires the Defendant and all Federal and State Officers sworn under Oath or Affirmation to, “ . . . preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States . . . Whereas the provisions of Article II require The President of the United States to, “preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States ...” as his primary duty to the Cit­ izens of the United States. Will this Court allow Joseph Robinette Biden Jr., President of the United States, to continue to wrongfully utilize his Office of Public Trust to prioritize the advancement of personal and party politics’ goals and objectives by allowing the illegal editing and altering of the Constitution of the United States over his Sworn (or Affirmed) Primary Duties of, “ . . . preserving, protecting, and defending the Constitution of the United States . . . ”?

Whether the District Court and the Ninth Circuit Court Violated their respective Constitutional Oaths or Affirmations by discharging the original Case before the Court brought by the Petitioner, Mr. David John Thistle, under the Color of Law 18 U.S. Code § 242 depravation of Rights (also found and pro­ tected under the “Substantive Due Process Clause”) by States’ Rights Violations and 33 U.S. Code Ch. 7 due to a technicality and not the merits of the evidence of the case. Will this Court now review the Election Corruption Evidence presented and allow for this case to be reviewed under the color of law 18 U.S. Code § 242 and possibly 33 U.S. Code Ch7.?

Will this Court allow additional Case Laws that may apply to this Case such as 42 U.S. Code § 1983