Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Dennis M. Buckovetz v. Department of the Navy

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 23-55284 · judgment April 5, 2024


Certiorari denied · November 4, 2024
Pre-decision estimate: 1% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Questions presented

Retired U.S. Marine Lt. Colonel Dennis Buckovetz was copied on emails revealing a covert scheme in which a military general had on-duty U.S. Marines sell Marine Corps “Challenge Coins” awarded to recruits who complete grueling training. The proceeds topped $100,000 per year – accumulated under the radar of government accounting. The illgotten gains funded parties and activities prohibited from being paid for with public funds. The creators replaced the enduring motto of “God, Corps and Country” with “God, Corps and Cash.” The Colonel filed a federal Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”). The Navy’s response hid emails Colonel Buckovetz had revealing the scheme, and did not provide a full response. Because the Navy later provided ‘some’ emails, the lower courts dismissed his case, overlooking a critical fact: the Navy did not provide all required responsive records. The Ninth Circuit’s decision is a seal of approval for federal agencies to provide citizens only a partial response violating the letter and spirit of FOIA. The net effect of the decision will gut FOIA – the nation’s premier law designed as a “check against corruption and to hold the governors accountable to the governed.” The critical federal questions presented are:

  1. Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in holding that the District Court lacked jurisdiction because the case was not justiciable premised on mootness.

  2. Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in holding that the District Court lacked jurisdiction at the time the case was filed because the action was not justiciable premised on a lack of standing.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Steven Asher Haber
Obermayer, Rebmann, et al.

For respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar
Solicitor General

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Linked docket
23A1175

Proceedings

  1. Nov 04 2024
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Oct 09 2024
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/1/2024.
  3. Oct 07 2024
    Waiver of right of respondent Dept. of Navy to respond filed.
  4. Sep 03 2024
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 7, 2024)
  5. Jul 02 2024
    Application (23A1175) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until September 2, 2024.
  6. Jun 25 2024
    Application (23A1175) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 4, 2024 to September 2, 2024, submitted to Justice Kagan.