In Re Peter K. Stern

Whether the Petitioner prevails on his claim of want of subject matter jurisdiction on the part of the District Court for the Western District of North Carolina on Counts One, Two and Three of the original Indictment in Case No. 2:99-cr-ooo81-MR-l due to the clearly stated Congressional Intent memorialized in THE COMMITTEE ON BANKING, HOUSING, AND URBAN AFFAIRS of the U.S. Senate Hearing on S.1009, July 17,1996 and the fatal flaw and lack of subject matter jurisdiction created by the absence of an implementing regulation in 26 U.S.C. supporting 26 U.S.C. § 7212A thereby exceeding the bounds of its lawful jurisdiction and wrongfully usurping the authority of Congress.

Whether the Petitioner prevails on his claim that the District Court materially and wrongfully erred and exhibited prejudice and bias against the Petitioner in denying the Petitioner the exculpatory testimony of Russell Dean Landers in Case No. Case No. 2:99-cr00081-MR-l with respect to Counts Four, Five, Six and Seven of the Indictment and withholding the exculpatory evidence in the S.1009 Congressional Report nullifying Counts One and Three of the Indictment from the Trial Jury in violation of the Fifth and Sixth Amendment and on which the government failed to prove an essential element of the offense.

Whether the Petitioner prevails in his claim that the U.S. Attorney’s office in the Western District of North Carolina through A.U.S.A. David Brown perpetrated a series of material, pervasive, deliberate, and knowing acts of fraud on the District Court, the Grand Jury, and the