Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Lauren N. Stone v. Theodore Worner, et al.
Paid petition · Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia Office, No. 2260 EDA 2023 · judgment February 2, 2024
Before the decision, modestly above the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for counsel with five or more prior petitions here, a circuit split argued in the petition, and a dissent in the court below (flagged in the petition).
Question presented
Does Pennsylvania’s Child Custody Act, 23 Pa. Stat. and Cons. Stat. Ann. § 5325, permitting a judge to grant to a grandparent, over a fit parent’s objection, partial physical custody of a child where the other parent is deceased, violate the fit parent’s right under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment? • Is a fit parent’s constitutional right, most recently addressed in Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57, 64, 120 S. Ct. 2054, 147 L. Ed. 2d 49 (2000), a fundamental right? • Must state laws restricting a fit parent’s right, such as the grandparent visitation statute like Pennsylvania’s, pass strict scrutiny review, or does lesser scrutiny apply? • Must a court order compelling custody or visitation over a fit parent’s objection be premised on a finding of harm or potential harm to the child? • Does the state court decision in Petitioner’s case violate Troxel’s holding that a fit parent’s constitutional right cannot be overridden simply because a judge believes another decision is better for the child?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Michael James Confusione
Hegge & Confusione
For respondent
Yoninah R. Orenstein
Flaster Greenberg, P.C.
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 07 2024Petition DENIED.
- Aug 07 2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
- Jul 22 2024Waiver of right of respondent Theodore Worner, et al. to respond filed.
- Jul 03 2024Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 8, 2024)