Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Devas Multimedia Private Limited v. Antrix Corp. Ltd., et al.

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 20-36024, 22-35085, 22-35103 · judgment August 1, 2023


Decided · June 5, 2025
Pre-decision estimate: 9% cert probability (95% interval 6%–12%)

Before the decision, about 2.1× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for counsel who has won certiorari before, a Ninth Circuit decision below, and a circuit split argued in the petition, and down for a business respondent.

Question presented

Consolidated with 23-1201. Under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, "[p]ersonal jurisdiction over a foreign state shall exist as to every claim for relief over which the district courts have jurisdiction under subsection (a) where service has been made under section 1608 of this title." 28 U.S.C. § 1330 (b). The question presented is: Whether the exercise of personal jurisdiction over a foreign state under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act requires satisfaction of the minimum-contacts test.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Aaron Michael Streett
Baker Botts, L.L.P.

For respondent
Carter G. Phillips
Sidley Austin LLP

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Related
Vide, 23-1201

Argument & decision

Argued March 3, 2025 — Aaron Streett · Matthew D. McGill · Sarah M. Harris · Carter G. Phi.... Audio and transcript

Decided June 5, 2025. Opinion by Alito.

Proceedings

  1. Jul 07 2025
    Judgment Issued.
  2. Jun 05 2025
    Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Alito, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. VIDED.
  3. Mar 03 2025
    Argued. For petitioner in 24-17: Aaron Streett, Houston, Tex. For petitioners in 23-1201: Matthew D. McGill, Washington, D. C. For United States, as amicus curiae supporting petitioners: Sarah M. Harris, Acting Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Carter G. Phillips, Washington, D. C. VIDED.
  4. Nov 27 2024
    Record requested from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
  5. Nov 22 2024
    SET FOR ARGUMENT on Monday, March 3, 2025. VIDED.
  6. Oct 04 2024
    Petition GRANTED. The petition for a writ of certiorari in No. 23-1201 is granted. The cases are consolidated, and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument. VIDED.
  7. Oct 04 2024
    Because the Court has consolidated these cases for briefing and oral argument, future filings and activity in the cases will now be reflected on the docket of No. 23-1201. Subsequent filings in these cases must therefore be submitted through the electronic filing system in No. 23-1201. Each document submitted in connection with one or more of these cases must include on its cover the case number and caption for each case in which the filing is intended to be submitted. Where a filing is submitted in fewer than all of the cases, the docket entry will reflect the case number(s) in which the filing is submitted; a document filed in all of the consolidated cases will be noted as “VIDED.”
  8. Aug 21 2024
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
  9. Aug 20 2024
    Reply of petitioner Devas Multimedia Private Limited filed. (Distributed)
  10. Aug 06 2024
    Brief of respondents Antrix Corp., Ltd., et al. in opposition filed. VIDED.
  11. Jul 03 2024
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 8, 2024)
  12. Apr 30 2024
    Application (23A966) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until July 5, 2024.
  13. Apr 25 2024
    Application (23A966) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 6, 2024 to July 5, 2024, submitted to Justice Kagan.