Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Eshed J. L. Alston v. Kent County Levy Court and Department of Planning Services, et al.

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, No. 23-2350 · judgment February 9, 2024


Certiorari denied · October 7, 2024
Pre-decision estimate: 0% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Question presented

USAF Vet Christian Prophet Shaman in reality of the King of Spirits Most High GOD. As is real US Constitution’s First Amendment Proclamation relied upon (Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof) Relevantly uniquely American Creed in GOD WE TRUST context. Reader are not judicial oaths of office over a Christian Bihle. Are not 2024 events the very same racist prohibited First Amendment violations. Complained of as real denial of exercise of Religion expression freedom before US Supreme Court raising the same issues of violations of these federal Statutes. Predicated on antiChristian racism are occurring as a matter of fact again Q-l Was it not unlawful violations of applications of invoked Statutory laws 18 USC Sec 1512/1513/241/242 provisions. For Merit Panel of Krause Matey and Chung to dismiss a validated uncontested witness observations pending discovery of Statutory law violations by the clerk and others. Concealed pending sought discovery was briefed to the panel. Is it not true US District Court judge Stark knowingly created unlawful color of law 2020 precedent violating provisions of 18 USC Sec 1512/1513/241/242 victim informant and witness protection from abuse true intent. Of inherent penalties for informing witnesses victimizations Q-2 Was not material evidence of fraud timely presented to the biased panel preserved in 40 uncontested memorandum. Of record preservation known to be documenting incorporated Statutory law violations. Did not the panels biased lack of due diligence negate Petitioner due required due process rights Q-3. Was

Counsel of record

For petitioner
EShed Alston

For respondent
Scott G Wilcox
Giordano. Delcollo, Webb & Gagne, LLC

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Oct 07 2024
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Sep 11 2024
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
  3. Sep 03 2024
    Waiver of right of respondent Kent County Levy Court and Dept. of Planning Services, et al. to respond filed.
  4. Jun 06 2024
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 6, 2024)