California Association for the Preservation of Gamefowl v. Stanislaus County, California

Whether a statute of limitations for facial constitutional challenges begins to run solely from the date of enactment, or whether each day of continued enforcement creates new injuries that refresh the limitations period.

Whether an ordinance that entirely eliminates non-commercial ownership of a category of property while exempting commercial owners constitutes a per se regulatory taking requiring just compensation under the Fifth Amendment.

Whether legislation targeting non-commercial property owners for disparate treatment without evidence of greater harm constitutes arbitrary action violating substantive due process.

Whether retroactively eliminating existing property rights without compensation or individualized process constitutes an unconstitutional bill of attainder.