Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

RDFS, LLC v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, et al.

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, No. 24-1530 · judgment January 8, 2025


Certiorari denied · October 14, 2025
Pre-decision estimate: 1% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Questions presented

The Natural Gas Act (“NGA”), 15 U.S.C. § 717 et seq., empowers the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) to issue certificates of public convenience and necessity, which authorize certain natural gas pipeline operations and grant the power of eminent domain. FERC, in turn, promulgated 18 C.F.R. § 157.201 et seq., creating the “Blanket Certificate” mechanism, which grants holders “automatic authorization” to exercise eminent domain for certain categories of activities “without further Commission approval.” Id. §§ 157.203, 157.208. Here, a private entity used its blanket certificate to condemn property over forty years after its issuance against a landowner who had no notice of or opportunity to oppose the certificate. The Fourth Circuit held without discussion that it lacked jurisdiction, deferring to FERC on the question of FERC’s power to promulgate the regulations which deprive the judiciary of jurisdiction. The questions presented are:

  1. Whether a court of appeals may defer to FERC on the threshold question of FERC’s authority to issue blanket certificates without determining the legality of the agency’s asserted power?

  2. Whether the NGA, 15 U.S.C. § 717 et seq., and the Constitution permit FERC to issue blanket certificates under 18 C.F.R. § 157.201 et seq. which never expire, are unlimited in geographic scope, and— according to FERC—may not be challenged after the statutory thirty-day rehearing deadline, irrespective of future condemnations that may occur decades or centuries after the date of the original grant?

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Joy Melina Diaz Llaguno
Hook & Hook PLLC

For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences

Linked docket
24A935

Proceedings

  1. Oct 14 2025
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Sep 24 2025
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/10/2025.
  3. Sep 22 2025
    Reply of petitioner RDFS, LLC filed. (Distributed)
  4. Sep 10 2025
    Brief of Federal Energy Regulatory Commission in opposition filed.
  5. Sep 10 2025
    Brief of respondent Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC in opposition filed.
  6. Jul 30 2025
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including September 10, 2025, for all respondents.
  7. Jul 29 2025
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 11, 2025 to September 10, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
  8. Jul 11 2025
    Response Requested. (Due August 11, 2025)
  9. Jun 17 2025
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
  10. Jun 13 2025
    Waiver of right of respondent Federal Respondents to respond filed.
  11. Jun 06 2025
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 10, 2025)
  12. Apr 01 2025
    Application (24A935) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until June 7, 2025.
  13. Mar 26 2025
    Application (24A935) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 8, 2025 to June 7, 2025, submitted to The Chief Justice.