Chunyi Xu, aka David Xu v. Denver Public Schools, School District No. 1

I’ve kept fighting for 6 years already. The 2nd Summary Judgment at Federal Colorado and Appeal Courts is seriously unjust and has many errors. The key words for facts and legal issues include “Salem”, “deceptive reassignments”, “racism”, “threat”, “zero classroom support”, “job performance”, “workload”, “school RIB reduction”, “District non-renewal with three-years’ penalty”, “insubordinate”, “PII-SSN violation”, “NOA & Disqualified”. The following presented questions are selected from more than two dozen questions with legal issues and fact details in deep insight. The path of the true answers can logically prove my four-allegations of Discrimination, neither “due to performance”, nor “no genuine fact dispute” Q1-- Shall Supreme Court Justice check if lower Federal-Court Judges used upside down Cause-Effect logic clauses in many situations, and if shall consider the neutral opinions from my witnesses in my disclosure list, like former Senior students, former victim teacher Joshua Noriega, UCD Manager Evan McClintock, but not all district employees of the same interest group only in DPS? Q2-- Are the tremendous quantity of facts true, including flip-flop of reassignments, zero classroom support, improved performance, racism, plotted RIB, Non-Renew, stalking in job fair, sabotage in reference check, conspired investigation, refused commencement, canceling summer job, false affidavits, violation of Protection Order and PII-SSN?