Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Windy Cove, Inc., a California corporation, et al. v. Circle K Stores, Inc., a Texas corporation
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 23-2679 · judgment December 3, 2024
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
Whether all gasoline, including branded gasoline, is a fungible commodity.
-
Whether in an open price term contract governed by California Commercial Code §2305 (adopted from Uniform Commercial Code §2-305), setting wholesale prices by using a method and manner that is not standard within the industry nor used by any other wholesale distributor pushes a case out of Uniform Commercial Code §2-305’s good faith safe harbor provision.
-
Whether in an open price term contract governed by California Commercial Code §2305 (adopted from Uniform Commercial Code §2-305), the proper “in the range” price comparison analysis in determining whether a seller’s price is commercially reasonable (and thus set in good faith) is (a) a comparison between those within the same class of trade as the seller/merchant or (b) a comparison between those whom the seller considers to be its “competitors” regardless of class of trade.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Kenneth Paul Roberts
K.P. Roberts & Associates, APLC
For respondent
Robert M. Dato
Buchalter, APC
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences
Linked docket
24M84
Proceedings
- Jun 16 2025Petition DENIED.
- May 27 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/12/2025.
- May 20 2025Waiver of right of respondent Circle K Stores, Inc. to respond filed.
- May 19 2025Motion Granted.
- Apr 23 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2025.
- Apr 14 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 18, 2025)
- Apr 14 2024Motion of petitioner for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal filed.