Gilda Ryan, et al. v. County of Imperial, California, et al.

Whether the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals sanctioning of The District Court’s effective use of a pro-se litigants §1983 based civil action as a type of on-the-job training platform for inexperienced Jurist and attorneys; Leading to Petitioner’s claims being decided on the basis of false narratives, alterations of caselaw text, and legal propositions that conflict with Supreme Court precedent, constitutes the type of severe departure from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings that calls out for an exercise of This Court’s powers of supervision.

Whether The Ninth Circuit Court Of Appeals, has severely departed from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings, by ratifying the District Court’s failure to acknowledge or properly address a large volume of sanctionable conduct occurring in an action, including but not limited to a comprehensive denial of due process inflicted on self-represented Plaintiffs, after they requested terminating sanctions be levied against members of the bar association and the clients they represent, to a degree that calls for an exercise of The Supreme Court’s powers of supervision.