Angelique Layton v. RBL Financial LLC, et al.

l.Does Colorado’s current expansive interpretation of C.R.C.P. Rule 107 violate constitutional rights of non-parties by interpreting the Rule to apply to anyone living anywhere while disallowing the defenses of governmental immunity and expanding contempt to include even legal actions by the nonparty? 2.Does lack of proper service and improper underlying documents in a foreclosure case deprive the court of personal and subject matter jurisdiction ab initio? 3.Does C.R.C.P. Rule 105 violate substantive and procedural due process? 4. Does Justice Rice’s decision as Commissioner in this case violate Petitioner’s due process rights by excluding her from the partition hearing and depriving her of her property rights in violation of her own authored opinions in Colantuno v. A. Tenenbaum & Company, Inc., 23 P.3d 708 (2001) and Kerns v. Kerns, 53 P.3d 1157 (Colo. 2002)