Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Marco Antonio Miranda Sanchez v. Pamela Bondi, Attorney General

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, No. 22-1319 · judgment December 5, 2023


GVR'd · June 30, 2025
Pre-decision estimate: 3% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Paul Whitfield Hughes
McDermott Will & Emery

For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 4 conferences

Proceedings

  1. Aug 01 2025
    Judgment Issued.
  2. Jun 30 2025
    Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of Riley v. Bondi, 606 U. S. ___ (2025).
  3. Jun 26 2025
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/26/2025.
  4. Oct 28 2024
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/1/2024.
  5. Oct 02 2024
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/18/2024.
  6. Sep 30 2024
    Rescheduled.
  7. Sep 25 2024
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2024.
  8. Sep 23 2024
    Waiver of the 14-day waiting period for the distribution of the petition pursuant to Rule 15.5 filed by petitioner.
  9. Sep 23 2024
    Reply of petitioner Marco Antonion Miranda Sanchez filed. (Distributed)
  10. Sep 13 2024
    Brief of respondent Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General filed.
  11. Sep 06 2024
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including September 13, 2024.
  12. Sep 05 2024
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 9, 2024 to September 13, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
  13. Jul 30 2024
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including September 9, 2024.
  14. Jul 29 2024
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 8, 2024 to September 9, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
  15. Jul 03 2024
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 8, 2024)
  16. Jul 03 2024
    Pursuant to Rule 34.6 and Paragraph 9 of the Guidelines for the Submission of Documents to the Supreme Court's Electronic Filing System, filings in this case should be submitted in paper form only, and should not be submitted through the Court's electronic filing system.