Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Edward Plummer, Jr. v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, et al.
Paid petition · Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District, No. A162565 · judgment September 25, 2024
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate: the model weighted this down for a self-represented petitioner.
Question presented
Does our judicial system deny pro se litigants substantive due process when the courts are remise in ensuring that such litigants are timely and properly notified of court actions and they are not provided leave to amend their complaint?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Edward Plummer Jr.
For respondent
—
Case
Subject area
Due Process (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Order
Order list, June 2, 2025 · Certiorari denied
Proceedings
- Jun 02 2025Petition DENIED.
- May 13 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/29/2025.
- Mar 28 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 1, 2025)