Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
In Re Yehoram Uziel
Paid petition
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
This petition seeks restoration of Petitioner' right to a fair trial by impartial tribunal; and relief from USCA9 judicial discriminatory misconduct to deprive a self represented litigant of access to litigate, including imposition of cruel and unusual punishment without due process of law.
-
Whether Petitioner is entitled to an Extraordinary Writ of Mandamus to litigate his FEDERAL Court cases against the State of California1?
-
Whether Petitioner is entitled to an Extraordinary Writ of Mandamus to USCA9 to enforce with strict scrutiny, compliance with 28 USC §§ 455, in order to protect Petitioner' Constitutional right of fair trial before an impartial tribunal?
-
Whether Petitioner is entitled to an Extraordinary Writ of mandamus to USCA9 to vacate 20- 55554, 21-56306, 21-56303 and remand 2:l9-cv-01458 and 2:21-cv-0730 to trials before new judicial officers at the US District Court of the Central District of California.
-
Whether Petitioner is entitled to an Extraordinary Writ of mandamus to prohibit the use of Rules of Courts or Federal Rules of Civil Procedures ("FCRP"), without substantive due process of law, to deprive litigants from their constitutional rights to: free speech, right to counsel, due process and fair and speedy trial before an impartial tribunal. As noted by Justice Fletcher dissenting opinion, "[w]hen faced with the corruption of our legal system, we must start ovef. Pizzuto v Blades, 673 F 3d 100S. 103,1023 (9™ Cir. 2012)
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Yehoram Uziel
For respondent
Darin Lee Wessel
Office of the Attorney General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences
Proceedings
- Jan 13 2025Rehearing DENIED.
- Dec 04 2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2025.
- Oct 17 2024Petition for Rehearing filed.
- Oct 07 2024Petition DENIED.
- Aug 07 2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
- Jul 18 2024Waiver of right of respondent Gavin Newsom, in his official Capacity as Governor of California to respond filed.
- Nov 15 2023Petition for a writ of mandamus filed. (Response due August 2, 2024)