Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Precision Drilling Corp., et al. v. Rodney Tyger, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, No. 22-1613 · judgment August 16, 2023
Before the decision, about 2.2× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a Third Circuit decision below, counsel with five or more prior petitions here, and a circuit split argued in the petition.
Question presented
Whether the Fair Labor Standards Act, which exempts from required compensation all activities that are “preliminary” or “postliminary” to employees’ principal work activities, 29 U.S.C. § 254(a)(2), nevertheless requires employers to compensate employees for donning and doffing generic protective clothing that does not protect against job-specific hazards that transcend ordinary risks. (i)
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Jonathan Saul Franklin
Norton Rose Fulbright US, LLP
For respondent
Adam Ross Pulver
Public Citizen Litigation Group
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Amicus briefs
2 cert-stage
Proceedings
- Jun 03 2024Petition DENIED.
- May 14 2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/30/2024.
- May 13 2024Reply of petitioners Precision Drilling Corp., et al. filed. (Distributed)
- May 09 2024Waiver of the 14-day waiting period for the distribution of the petition pursuant to Rule 15.5 filed by petitioner.
- May 01 2024Brief of respondents Rodney Tyger, et al. in opposition filed.
- Apr 01 2024Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Manufacturers filed.
- Mar 29 2024Brief amicus curiae of International Association of Drilling Contractors filed.
- Mar 18 2024Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 1, 2024.
- Mar 15 2024Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 1, 2024 to May 1, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
- Feb 28 2024Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 1, 2024)