Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
In Re David Erlanson, Sr.
Paid petition
Certiorari denied · April 29, 2024
Pre-decision estimate: 0% cert probability
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Can the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals indefinitely prolong or avoid its judicial duty when a judicial process in the lower district court resulted obviously in a criminal penalty being assessed within a civil proceeding, whereby the citizens private rights would normally act as a restriction upon the government in order to affect the timely resolution of the matter before them?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
David Erlanson Sr.
For respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar
Solicitor General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Apr 29 2024Petition DENIED.
- Apr 10 2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/26/2024.
- Mar 27 2024Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
- Feb 25 2024Petition for a writ of mandamus filed. (Response due April 1, 2024)