Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Nolan Marcus Forness, II v. Virginia
Paid petition · Supreme Court of Virginia, No. 220514 · judgment January 4, 2023
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Issue 1. Given the current extensive of use by law enforcement of modern technology such as automobile and body cameras, a defendant’s right under the Compulsory Process and Confrontation Clauses of the Sixth Amendment and Due Process Clauses of both the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to access the resultant recordings and this Court should delineate the protections afforded to defendants and the procedures and standards courts must employ with regard to the loss and/or destruction of such evidence: a) Regarding the admissibility of such evidence; and b) Regarding the right of the trier of fact to hear and assess such evidence.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Marvin David Miller
The Law Offices of Marvin D. Miller
For respondent
Andrew Nathan Ferguson
Office of the Attorney General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 02 2023Petition DENIED.
- Aug 23 2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
- Aug 22 2023Waiver of right of respondent Commonwealth of Virginia to respond filed.
- Jun 20 2023Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 31, 2023)