Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Brandon Holtan, et al. v. Mark Edward Nieters
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, No. 22-2600 · judgment October 11, 2023
Before the decision, modestly above the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a circuit split argued in the petition, an Eighth Circuit decision below, and a dissent in the court below (flagged in the petition).
Question presented
In the aftermath of the 2020 killing of George Floyd, civil unrest broke out across the country, including in Des Moines, Iowa. Mark Nieters, a freelance photographer, was in the immediate proximity of a traveling unlawful assembly. Law enforcement was receiving moment-to-moment updates on the whereabouts of this group of traveling unlawful assemblers. Des Moines Police Officer Brandon Holtan actually saw Nieters among people running from the scene of the unlawful assembly. Holtan saw that Nieters was wearing a helmet, goggles and a gas mask, similar to others who attended the unlawful assembly. He was taken to the ground and arrested for unlawful assembly. Nieters’s criminal charges were eventually dismissed. He sued City Defendants. The following questions are presented: 1. Whether probable cause existed, from the officer’s perspective, to arrest a person for failure to disperse from an unlawful assembly when an individual was in immediate proximity of a group of unlawful assemblers, was located where police had information unlawful assemblers were, and was dressed like an unlawful assembler with a helmet, gas mask, and goggles, meaning there was evidence of proximity to a crime and similar appearance to those committing the crime.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
John Oscar Haraldson
City of Des Moines Legal Department
For respondent
—
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Apr 15 2024Petition DENIED.
- Mar 27 2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2024.
- Feb 07 2024Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 11, 2024)